V-man
Well-Known Member
- Joined
- Jan 25, 2009
- Messages
- 6,660
- Reaction score
- 8,259
An offshoot idea of mine contemplating the “more important band:” Black Sabbath or Led Zeppelin (a whole other topic), I considered the existence of Metallica and posed the idea of Heavy Metal’s existence without a Metallica. My thoughts below. Feel free to discuss.
The Hetfield-Ulrich quartet of being the most successful (former) heavy metal band to date. Without question, 5-6 of the band’s entire roster have been some of the most praised and influential players of the genre. Undoubtedly successive bands have cited them as in influence…
BUT…
How important was the band in reality regarding the inevitable(?) advance of heavy metal across the landscape of the 1980s and beyond. My position is that they (like LZ to Rock) despite their undeniable presence and influence have done much to help shape the early part of the genre, but the band itself was not required in the least for the advancement of Heavy Metal following the NWOBHM.
1. NWOBHM paved an inevitable path to US/EU Heavy Metal advancement.
Judas Priest in particular along with Iron Maiden, Samson, Diamond Head, Venom and at least 12 other bands were gaining prominence among “hard rock” listeners. European players since Sabbath were getting heavier and faster than golden age ‘70s rock, Given the trend this point alone calls into question the necessity of the Hetfield-Ulrich quartet notwithstanding what those musicians brought to the table.
2. US virtuosos paralleled NWOBHM/blazed the genre before Metallica appeared
EVH was already a sensation. RR’s catalog with Ozzy was effectively completed before they recorded. George Lynch and a host of other gunslingers provided a sufficient landscape for any would-be heavy/fast player to explore and aspire to learning.
3. EU metal developed in parallel and its exposure was inevitable.
As UFO/Scorpions was an influence to Metallica, what followed was destined to reach the US notwithstanding Metallica’s existence. Mercyful Fate, Hellhammer/Celtic Frost, Kreator, and Destruction among others created the post-NWOBHM metal movement independent of US contribution.
4. Thrash (even Bay Area) was waiting in the wings independent of Metallica
East Coast Hardcore (i.e. Anthrax) was developing in parallel, but the CA family included players who were already forming up into the contemporaries of Metallica (including Armored Saint, Testament [Legacy] and Exodus among others). On the point of Exodus, they were THE live band to see/beat In the early days, destined to form the Apex slot of the bay area bands. However, Metallica stole Hammett out from under them and complications with their album made Exodus latecomers, behind 3 of the Big Four. That Hammett already had a career and Mustaine showed his ability to raise two bands to prominence (including Metallica) along with Cliff Burton’s talent ensured that most of their roster were destined to make their contribution regardless.
The Hetfield-Ulrich quartet of being the most successful (former) heavy metal band to date. Without question, 5-6 of the band’s entire roster have been some of the most praised and influential players of the genre. Undoubtedly successive bands have cited them as in influence…
BUT…
How important was the band in reality regarding the inevitable(?) advance of heavy metal across the landscape of the 1980s and beyond. My position is that they (like LZ to Rock) despite their undeniable presence and influence have done much to help shape the early part of the genre, but the band itself was not required in the least for the advancement of Heavy Metal following the NWOBHM.
1. NWOBHM paved an inevitable path to US/EU Heavy Metal advancement.
Judas Priest in particular along with Iron Maiden, Samson, Diamond Head, Venom and at least 12 other bands were gaining prominence among “hard rock” listeners. European players since Sabbath were getting heavier and faster than golden age ‘70s rock, Given the trend this point alone calls into question the necessity of the Hetfield-Ulrich quartet notwithstanding what those musicians brought to the table.
2. US virtuosos paralleled NWOBHM/blazed the genre before Metallica appeared
EVH was already a sensation. RR’s catalog with Ozzy was effectively completed before they recorded. George Lynch and a host of other gunslingers provided a sufficient landscape for any would-be heavy/fast player to explore and aspire to learning.
3. EU metal developed in parallel and its exposure was inevitable.
As UFO/Scorpions was an influence to Metallica, what followed was destined to reach the US notwithstanding Metallica’s existence. Mercyful Fate, Hellhammer/Celtic Frost, Kreator, and Destruction among others created the post-NWOBHM metal movement independent of US contribution.
4. Thrash (even Bay Area) was waiting in the wings independent of Metallica
East Coast Hardcore (i.e. Anthrax) was developing in parallel, but the CA family included players who were already forming up into the contemporaries of Metallica (including Armored Saint, Testament [Legacy] and Exodus among others). On the point of Exodus, they were THE live band to see/beat In the early days, destined to form the Apex slot of the bay area bands. However, Metallica stole Hammett out from under them and complications with their album made Exodus latecomers, behind 3 of the Big Four. That Hammett already had a career and Mustaine showed his ability to raise two bands to prominence (including Metallica) along with Cliff Burton’s talent ensured that most of their roster were destined to make their contribution regardless.