pacAir
Member
It seems that no U.S. online retailers have had the PEDL-10049 Marhall Haze 40 4-button footswitch in stock in recent memory and they all claim it will be available sometime after Christmas! I have no idea who screwed the pooch at Marshal or Korg, but having a nice little amp like this and no supply of footswitches to feed the demand (for many months!) while it is a hot topic is an extremely DUMB move on someone's part!
I have never seen this footswitch in the flesh and know of no one who actually has one! I also regularly check eBay and while a number of different people sell the amps no one sells the footswitch! While repairing a Marshall JVM I noticed that the 4-button JVM footswitch used on the 2-channel JVMs looks remarkably like the sole picture Marshall has released of the Haze foot switch (the one every online retailer uses). Also, the footswitch interface is the same... through a standard guitar cable and not some DIN plug derivative.
I thought this might indicate that the Haze 4-button FS will most likely have to "talk" to the Haze 40's switching processor in a fashion similar to that used in the JVM (overlooking the "programmability" aspect of the JVM footswitch for now). Since Marshall patented this technology it would make sense that they would use it in new designs!
I was able to pick up a 4-button JVM footswitch on eBay cheaper than buying the Haze FS (which is currently unobtainable). I intended on experimenting a bit to see if I can get the pair to talk or work without modification (or with simple "programming" using a friend's JVM combo). It would make sense for Marshall to use the same or similar footswitch circuit & technology so it may be possible to adapt the JVM footswitch to the Haze 40.
What I would give for a Haze schematic to evaluate some of this stuff! I have all the JVM schematics and the story they tell is fascinating (and absolutely required for repair). Why aren't the Haze schematics available?
If the 4-button JVM footswitch can be made to work, what might be done with the JVM 6-button? Perhaps anything that can be switched with the front panel controls could be assigned to the footswitches like the JVM (either hardwired internally or programmed). Only the footswitch firmware knows for sure!
Steve
I have never seen this footswitch in the flesh and know of no one who actually has one! I also regularly check eBay and while a number of different people sell the amps no one sells the footswitch! While repairing a Marshall JVM I noticed that the 4-button JVM footswitch used on the 2-channel JVMs looks remarkably like the sole picture Marshall has released of the Haze foot switch (the one every online retailer uses). Also, the footswitch interface is the same... through a standard guitar cable and not some DIN plug derivative.
I thought this might indicate that the Haze 4-button FS will most likely have to "talk" to the Haze 40's switching processor in a fashion similar to that used in the JVM (overlooking the "programmability" aspect of the JVM footswitch for now). Since Marshall patented this technology it would make sense that they would use it in new designs!
I was able to pick up a 4-button JVM footswitch on eBay cheaper than buying the Haze FS (which is currently unobtainable). I intended on experimenting a bit to see if I can get the pair to talk or work without modification (or with simple "programming" using a friend's JVM combo). It would make sense for Marshall to use the same or similar footswitch circuit & technology so it may be possible to adapt the JVM footswitch to the Haze 40.
What I would give for a Haze schematic to evaluate some of this stuff! I have all the JVM schematics and the story they tell is fascinating (and absolutely required for repair). Why aren't the Haze schematics available?
If the 4-button JVM footswitch can be made to work, what might be done with the JVM 6-button? Perhaps anything that can be switched with the front panel controls could be assigned to the footswitches like the JVM (either hardwired internally or programmed). Only the footswitch firmware knows for sure!
Steve