Everyone keeps saying "Dont get the TSL, the DSL does the same stuff as the TSL, and the TSL has more chances of breaking down." First of all, if you think the DSL can do what the TSL can, your either being really ignorant, or your just dumb, but right off the bat, the TSL has 3 channels, the DSL has 2, there are more EQ options on the TSL, and less on the DSL, and the power switch on the TSL, which the DSL doesn't have. Second, talk about contradiction, you say the TSL will break easier because of all the knobs and electronics? Um, correct me if I'm wrong, but doesn't the JVM410H have WAY more channels, 1/4in jacks and MIDI inputs/outputs??? DUH!!!
but the virtual power reduction doesn't sound good and of the three channels on the TSL, the only useable one is the green channel and even then, its not as sweet sounding as the DSL's green chan. IDK... I had a TSL 100 for 1 year and could not get the sounds I wanted/needed out of it (classic rock, modern rock, 80's Metal, AC/DC etc). The clean channel was particularly bad. The worst clean tone coming out of a Marshall, ever... IMO, of course.
You obviously have a TSL and if you like it, more power to you but your logic is flawed - You seem to think that the TSL is better because it has more bells and whistles. Sounds like typical teenager train of thought. I guess that more power is better too?
I guess you can totally flame me now.