DSL troubles
New Member
I think anyone who has a real ear for tone can hear the poo in these modeling amps. I have never liked the sound of solid state anything vs tube
While it's true that you can't compare any Line 6 or other solid state amp to a Marshall when it comes to playing on stage, they really are great for recording. I've known tons of tone snobs who think they can tell whether amp modeling was used on a recording or not. The simple fact is that, if the patch was set up by someone who knows something about tone to begin with, you just won't be able to tell. It's true that it's more difficult to get *convincing* organic sounds out of a modeler, but it can be done. And yeah, the factory preset patches pretty much suck across the board on every modeler I've tried.
I like the Line 6 stuff because I know how to dial in good tones with it, and for recording purposes, it's a lot easier to ensure that your tone is consistent from one day to the next when you don't have to try to remember where you placed your cab mic 3 days ago.
As much as I want to make fun of these kids with their little Spider amps and their Zakk Wylde presets, I have to remember that these affordable amps are getting these kids engaged in playing guitar (and that's good mmmkay!). Obviously we all love Marshalls here, but honestly - how many of us could afford an all-tube Marshall when we first started playing guitar? I'd say the number is probably pretty small. The entry level gear kids have today is way better than the crap entry level gear we had back in the day.
I like their POD and their floor pod multi-effects units. I have the Floor Pod Plus that I use for my effects and to control my amp's buttons via MIDI. I have NEVER used the amp modeling feature on it, but I would use it as an emergency backup if my amp were to go down (thank god that hasn't happened).
I have to ask how many other brand of multi fx unit have some of you guys tried? This is just my 2 cents but I dont see the point of putting out the money for something that you only use 20% of when their are other dedicated machines that sound better (for less money if you look).
As usual the amp's tone is frickin' fake..loud as hell, but no tone. My 100w 900 dumps ALL over it..and all I can hear on his side of the stage is NOISE and no music.
Do you understand how a MIDI footcontroller with built-in effects can be useful to control an amp that has MIDI capabilities?
The MIDI can actually control an amp's buttons/switches. For example, in my JVM410H, I can use I can create a preset in a bank that will allow me to have a certain function turned on or off. Then, I can add effects to that same preset. This is how I use the JVM and Floor Pod Plus w/MIDI.
An example would be for "SONG A" in my set list. I have "SONG A" which requires some channel switching and effects. So I dedicate preset 1 for "SONG A". A sample of the tones I need for "SONG A" would be
BANK ONE
preset one (reserved for intro to "SONG A": (JVM) channel/mode=clean/green ON; (JVM) reverb ON; (JVM) Master Volume 1 ON; (JVM) effects loop ON; (floor pod) delay ON; (flood pod) chorus ON; (flood pod) gate OFF.
preset two (reversed for chorus of "SONG A": (JVM) channel/mode=OD1 orange ON; (JVM) reverb off; (JVM) Master Volume 2 ON; (JVM) effects loop ON; (flood pod) delay OFF; (flood pod) flange ON.
So, I can't speak for others, simply shutting down the amp modeling does not mean that I am only using 20% of the FPP's capabilities (it's probably some like (95%). All I'm doing is shutting down the amp+cabinet modeling. The delay, effects, noise gate, tone, level, and MIDI are incoporated for just about every song presets. I agree, it might be a waste of money to have all those capabilities at your feet and ONLY use the MIDI, but that's not my situation. So like I said, the effects are pretty good, but the modeling is not. TC electronics makes good effects, but I still would not use their overdrive because my amps is usually better (tube vs. digital). Line 6 amp are still not very good.
Line 6 amps are complete garbage. The only thing they make that's worth anything is the POD, and only that's good when using it for scratch tracks on guitar when recording, like so you can play through headphones to a drummer. That's all it's good for. It still sounds terrible even then.
Sorry you gotta put up with this shit. Some people just don't know. They just see a bunch of bells and whistles and think they all have to be great.
I'm a long time Marshall fan and user, and I'm also a long time Line 6 user.
I've owned about 10 Marshall heads over the years, 3 currently. I also have owned a Line 6 AX2-212 since 1999. The AX2 was my only amp for a while due to living in an apartment and not really having a use for a loud tube amp as I very rarely played out.
I can honestly say that I got REALLY good at tweaking that AX2 and have a number of great organic sounding patches for a variety of situations. I also have a POD XT Live that I've gotten similar results with.
I keep both Line 6 products around as backups. If I show up to a gig and the 6100 won't light up or goes down for some reason, I can grab the POD from the trunk, plug it into the PA and keep the show going.
For smaller gigs where the head and cab is too much for the stage size or whatever, the AX2 steps in with a smaller footprint and very usable tones.
Do the Line 6 units sound EXACTLY like my Marshalls? Hell no. But they do a good job of getting great tones of their own that are usable in all kinds of situations.
Line 6 is a great practice tool and something to lay down quick tracks in the studio with - but it's not the real thing.
Just ask a line 6 lover how many PRO'S they know who tour and/or record with line 6....... now ask them how many use MARSHALL!
What do the other guys in the band think about it?
If they like his shit sound, maybe you are better off leaving and moving onto something else.