tomguitar1963
New Member
- Joined
- Dec 21, 2007
- Messages
- 9
- Reaction score
- 0
Yeah, and if possible, some gut shots (Wanna check out the build quality on this thing)
Gut shots would be very nice to see!
Ouch. That's a lot of surface mount, DSP and specialized chips.
Tiny little filter caps.
Neither the PT or OT have bells on them.
The switches aren't sealed.
I actually heard one this week and thought that it sounded like a cardboard box
Those chips turned me right off
And a 66watt speaker? interestingly precise.
Im not suprised by the internal tech. Its designed using all the modern techniques for electronic production, which permit such devices to be built economicaly, and provide features that could only be dreamed of when the fisrt Marshalls were designed. Although its inspired by some of the classics, its built here in the 21st century.
Unfortunately, that may mean that Grandpa amp-tech cant always fix it at the corner shop when it goes wrong. Thats the way of it these days.
John
Marshall reminds me a lot of Ferrari: steeped in mystique and always current with new technologies in the new products. But there are the customers who say the new cars/amps have no "passion" like the mechanical/low tech cars/amps of yesteryear. "I want carburetors and no IC chips"...
Well, go buy a 308 Ferrari instead of a 612, and get a Plexi instead of a Haze...! LOL I like both vintage and modern myself...two different approaches.
Ken
My point was that in the low wattage market, the Vox Night Train and Orange Tiny Terror are very affordable, sound amazing and they don't need to cheap out on parts like Marshall.
This is more of a features vs cost debate. They could have reduced the number of features and build in a little more quality/durability IMO.
Only time will tell how these things hold up.
Heres a little background on the internals of the Haze.
The surface mount components you see are all on one, small effects DSP, much like you would find in a delay or reverb pedal. From a servicing point of view, these rarely go wrong, but can be replace with a new plug in board, so should be no more complicated to replace than a valve.
Apart from that, there are only 2 more integrated circuits. These control the switching. The other black boxes you can see are relays, which switch the signals to change channels. These contain the same "stuff" as a switch on the front panel, but can be changed by the footswitch. Each of these is controlled by a transistor, but that is not in the signal path.
With the effects and loop switched off, the signal never goes near a lump of silicon.
Heres a little background on the internals of the Haze.
The surface mount components you see are all on one, small effects DSP, much like you would find in a delay or reverb pedal. From a servicing point of view, these rarely go wrong, but can be replace with a new plug in board, so should be no more complicated to replace than a valve.
I haven't played a Haze yet so I can't say about sound, but my point was a reaction to those pics!! I went "YIPE" when I saw all the chips, but then realized this is the 21st century and Marshall is using modern engineering. Albeit on the cheap side?
Ken
I see more than 1 SM device on there and DSP chips can become obsolete. Worst case, you yank that thing out.