LargeBoxSmallBox
Well-Known Member
- Joined
- Feb 9, 2013
- Messages
- 333
- Reaction score
- 1,121
Yes! That also sounds amazing!! Sweet rig...you done good, man, happy playing!
you can get a good cranked sound at conversation levels...How does this amp sound when paired with the JohnH Attenuator? Is it possible to get it cranked past 4 o'clock while maintaining a 80-90 dB level?
I'm positive that is an option. Because I can do that on my SV and the ST isn't massively different. If you need it real quiet, then you bump the amp down to 5w mode (Power Scaling) and it's very quiet. The JohnH M2 will remove approx 31db and works extremely well with these 4 holers.How does this amp sound when paired with the JohnH Attenuator? Is it possible to get it cranked past 4 o'clock while maintaining a 80-90 dB level?
@svinyard @Dogs of Doom
Thanks! One more question, which 1x12 cabinet will be a better match? Should I go for the matching creamback cab or get a 1974CX Greenback? I'm not sure what kind of sound I want, but I like rock and funk.
How is the effects loop on these amps, does it work right, is it quiet? I have an SC and the effects loop sucks. I had a combo before I sold it and bought a head version and the effect's loop sucked on it, too. Very noisy on both of them. I'm going to sell my SC and get an ST (for several reasons) and I'm just hoping the FX loop is better on these.
A couple of theories on this:
SC20 and SV20 use EL34s, The same tubes used in the amps they are attempting to replicate.
ST20 use 5881 tubes. The JTM45 used KT66 valves which would have been impractical and expensive to use in the studio series.
ST is naturally going to differ quite a bit to the JTM45 which would be the most difficult one to replicate in a 20w studio amp.
Maybe this contributes to the reason why the ST20 is more of its own thing and is not really being compared or talked about in relation to the JTM45.
Or maybe people are just having too much fun playing their ST20s to bother talking about them here!