Get the amp if its working right- they;re really quite good-Eyeing one of the little TSL's, pretty sure i can get it for way under 200, problem is if it's even worth that much, or would i get more cheap fun out of a new pickup or something?
... presuming the guts don't look like....
It does have a little "9-pin port" installed at the back, a vga-type connector or something similar.
Have no clue why, but it's located besides the footswitch-connector, maybe as a secondary connection for a different footswitch. But it comes with the original FS.
No bias issues on the TSL60. I had one. Parallel FX loop it's rare. I didn't like It. I moded It to work like a booster. But a TSL100 it's better IMHO.Eyeing one of the little TSL's, pretty sure i can get it for way under 200, problem is if it's even worth that much, or would i get more cheap fun out of a new pickup or something?
Did you have a 2000DSL too? If so, how closeBut a TSL100 it's better IMHO.
Did you have a 2000DSL too? If so, how close
were the DSL and the TSL60?
Since i already got 2 2000DSL100's.
Thx. It's a head.TSL 60 head? Or combo?
Jethro hit it on the head between head or combo. I tried to get the combo version to sound some sort of good but it just wouldn't. Stay away from that one. Those wolverine speakers are sad man. Gave a Marshall a black eye.T
TSL 60 head? Or combo?
The TSL sounds more.. old school? I dunno. Less fizzy to me. I absolutely love mine but I do higher gain stuff. Tighten it up a lil with an OD.
If it is a combo the Wolverine speakers in the 602 2x12 are just atrocious. Lifeless and bland.
I prefer the TSL to the older DSLthus I still have my TSL
Yah that had me concerned. Glad its not combo.Thx. It's a head.
Did you have a 2000DSL too? If so, how close
were the DSL and the TSL60?
Since i already got 2 2000DSL100's.
Thx mate!I had a DSL100 and a TSL60. I liked most of the tones from the DSL but wanted independent EQ controls for more balanced clean to dirty sounds. The TSL was better in that regard. The parallel loop ruined the amp for me; I should have modded it.
The biggest difference is the DSL can do clean to medium gain on the green channel. The TSL is just clean. If you live on DSL green you may be disappointed with a TSL.
I don't know but the problem for me was volume balance between channels using the FX loop. Clean channel just have the master volume pot but crunch/lead channels has volume channel pot plus the master volume pot.Why did they do it in the first place parallel?