70's Acoustic 470 head

  • Thread starter smokeshowin
  • Start date
  • This site may earn a commission from merchant affiliate links like Ebay, Amazon, and others.

smokeshowin

Member
Joined
Jan 14, 2024
Messages
26
Reaction score
41
In 1978 I had an Acoustic 470 head with the 407 cab which had 2x15 speakers and a front-loaded horn. I wanted the loudest amp in the store and the owner showed me that. I tried it and holy crap! You couldn't stand in front of it on 4! It was brutal. Has anybody ever played through one of these? I was in a band at the time, and it blew away the other guitar players Marshall 50. The Marshall sounded better though, ALOT better. But for pure power, the 470 was hard to beat. It did well against the Marshall 100w too, but not by much. I think the horn helped the highs cut through for leads.
 

FleshOnGear

Harmonic Hermit
Gold Supporting Member
Joined
May 2, 2017
Messages
2,745
Reaction score
4,897
Location
Virginia
In 1978 I had an Acoustic 470 head with the 407 cab which had 2x15 speakers and a front-loaded horn. I wanted the loudest amp in the store and the owner showed me that. I tried it and holy crap! You couldn't stand in front of it on 4! It was brutal. Has anybody ever played through one of these? I was in a band at the time, and it blew away the other guitar players Marshall 50. The Marshall sounded better though, ALOT better. But for pure power, the 470 was hard to beat. It did well against the Marshall 100w too, but not by much. I think the horn helped the highs cut through for leads.
Never played one, but I bet that rig could’ve taken your head clean off! Especially with that horn. Yikes! Was that amp totally clean? Or did it have any built-in distortion?
 

smokeshowin

Member
Joined
Jan 14, 2024
Messages
26
Reaction score
41
Never played one, but I bet that rig could’ve taken your head clean off! Especially with that horn. Yikes! Was that amp totally clean? Or did it have any built-in distortion?
It was super clean being solid state. The distortion was built in the amp and lost some of the thump with distortion on. At the time the only pedal I used was a wah.
 

StingRay85

Well-Known Member
Joined
Aug 18, 2019
Messages
3,440
Reaction score
3,704
Right now I still have a 360 preamp, 2x 270, 1x 370, a 330, 2x 220, 301 cab, 406 cab, 402 cab, 201 cab, 105 cab, a 127 combo and 2x G100T combo.

Used to have a few more 125 combos, a 450 and 470, and even a 408 cab.

The 270 is probably the most brutal solid state guitar amp ever made
 

Tatzmann

Well-Known Member
Joined
Nov 8, 2021
Messages
2,549
Reaction score
4,438
Bolder Damn's LP from 1971 has been recorded with an Acoustic 270 Head and 271 Cab. Bass was an ACC too but don't know the model.

 

FleshOnGear

Harmonic Hermit
Gold Supporting Member
Joined
May 2, 2017
Messages
2,745
Reaction score
4,897
Location
Virginia
It was super clean being solid state. The distortion was built in the amp and lost some of the thump with distortion on. At the time the only pedal I used was a wah.
How was the quality of the distortion? Was it on par with the SS Kustoms like Fogerty used with CCR?
 

StingRay85

Well-Known Member
Joined
Aug 18, 2019
Messages
3,440
Reaction score
3,704
Bolder Damn's LP from 1971 has been recorded with an Acoustic 270 Head and 271 Cab. Bass was an ACC too but don't know the model.


That's awesome. THe 270 has a pretty cool build-in fuzz, although the 360 preamp has a bit more controls on its fuzz.

Most famous users of the 270 were Albert King and Frank Zappa.
 

Tatzmann

Well-Known Member
Joined
Nov 8, 2021
Messages
2,549
Reaction score
4,438
Albert always said he didn't know if all the speakers in his cab even worked.:p His Acoustic, along with his V's may be owned by Steven Seagal now, he's probably playing it at this moment feeling the millionaire's blues.
 

Tatzmann

Well-Known Member
Joined
Nov 8, 2021
Messages
2,549
Reaction score
4,438
How was the quality of the distortion? Was it on par with the SS Kustoms like Fogerty used with CCR?
The Bolder Damn record used the inbuilt fuzz of the 270 and it's reverb. Sounds good enough for raw rock, i'd say.
 

Matthews Guitars

Well-Known Member
Joined
Aug 17, 2019
Messages
8,813
Reaction score
15,112
For a few years (recently parted with it) I had a Fender 400PS, 435 all tube watts, the most powerful all tube guitar/bass head ever made on a production basis. Tonally it was a Twin Reverb, just absurdly loud. Given the right cabinets it'd split your head.

Turn up volume 1, hit it in the front with a tube screamer set to max clean boost, and adjust volume with the highly effective master volume control. Sounded surprisingly like a GOOD Superlead only with reverb and master volume.

It took three cabinets to get the full power rating of it. (435 watts, 145 each out of 3 separate transformer taps each with its own jack)

I have dimed it into three 4x12s. Wearing hearing protection, OF COURSE. It was pretty wild.
 

StingRay85

Well-Known Member
Joined
Aug 18, 2019
Messages
3,440
Reaction score
3,704
Reverb and fuzz could not be used at the same time though. I should check again how the footswitch worked. The 270 is pretty much the same as the 370 bass amp, only the EQ set points are a bit different. Unleashing its full power required a 2 ohm load. You would need 8 Marshall cabs to do that lol. The 201 cabs were 4 ohms, two Altec Lansing 8 ohm 15" speakers and a horn. I have 2 JBL E130-8 in my 201 cab, and threw out the horn.
 

FleshOnGear

Harmonic Hermit
Gold Supporting Member
Joined
May 2, 2017
Messages
2,745
Reaction score
4,897
Location
Virginia
I’m starting to think that GC (who now owns the Acoustic trademark) could make a buck reissuing the old models and pushing them to the stoner/doom crowd. Those cats love big and clean with powerful EQ for their fuzz pedals.
 

Latest posts



Top