It will also look killer
1/2 stack full size Marshall
I think that is the only difference, the 1922 is slightly smaller. Same spkrs ohms and watts. I just noticed another small difference while reading this thread. I've had it now for about 2 weeks, and haven't done the "fine tooth comb" thing yet. Priorities? The 1936 front panel face (where the spkrs are attached) is slanted slightly upwards. The base of the front panel sits 1" in from the forward edge of the outer cabinet walls, and the top sits 2" in from the front outer edge of the cabinet. So, it's not much, but it partially emulates the 1960A cabinet's upwards slant. By design, I hope? Maybe not?It really doesnt matter, when I get it I'll try both but I'm thinking closed back will give a little more balls to it. my current SS amp is open back and location in the room does play a part with the sound. Looking forward to dialing in, set it, and forget it, lol...
From my research, and please correct me if I am wrong, but the only difference between the 1936 and 1922 is that the 1922 cab dimensions are just a little smaller. Same speakers, impedance, & power rating. If I want a bigger 212, one of my neighbors is a custom cabinet maker for kitchens baths, etc. I can draw it up on a CAD and he will cut it out on his machines or find the 412 I want. For right now, I dont know what I dont know, so I need to start somewhere.
Thanks for the suggestions!
Sounds great! Let us know what you think of the 1922. Once you get that DSL100 hooked up to a nice cab you're going to be in hog heaven!Thank you!!
I'm going to check out the 1922 on Sunday. The guy that is selling use to run a studio and is downsizing. It looks brand new in the pics and if it is what it looks like in the pics, it will be coming home on Sunday. The G12T-75's are rated at 150w, so that should handle the amp in either 100w or 50w mode at the levels I'll be playing at for sure, and it is a horizontal cab so we are all good there. Looking at the specs, it's got the same speakers as the 1936 and I have not seen any posts dogging it, but I have seen some saying the MG & MX series are not as good. Plus, I have not found any reasonable priced 1936's in my area. For what they are asking for 1936's around here, I can get a decent 412.
For the price, I have lots of options with the 1922. I can get another 212 to run in stereo, get a 412 Cab and use the speakers in this one + 2 more to make exactly what I want, or sell it and get my money back for a Marshall 412. Always nice to have options, and this will get me up and running right now to learn the amp and then I'll know what I want if this isn't it.
Yes, the 1936 baffle is set back at the top - the 1922 baffle is vertical.I think that is the only difference, the 1922 is slightly smaller. Same spkrs ohms and watts. I just noticed another small difference while reading this thread. I've had it now for about 2 weeks, and haven't done the "fine tooth comb" thing yet. Priorities? The 1936 front panel face (where the spkrs are attached) is slanted slightly upwards. The base of the front panel sits 1" in from the forward edge of the outer cabinet walls, and the top sits 2" in from the front outer edge of the cabinet. So, it's not much, but it partially emulates the 1960A cabinet's upwards slant. By design, I hope? Maybe not?
Thanks fitz. Amazing what you can see if you just take a closer look? (must remember baffle term)Yes, the 1936 baffle is set back at the top - the 1922 baffle is vertical.
View attachment 146750
I was thinking 2 212's would not suck and be more versatileYes, the 1936 baffle is set back at the top - the 1922 baffle is vertical.
View attachment 146750
Those are my only 212's - most of my amps have a pair of 112's.I was thinking 2 212's would not suck and be more versatile
DSL100 @ 29.1" will stick out about 1.25" to each side of the 1922 cab @ 26.6".
a.k.a. Stonehenged.
"stonehenged"? ,,,,I like that description. I too had a full-size head, on a 1922 (combo-size) cab. Sounded fine, but the "look" bothered me.
Found an empty MC212 M.I.E. 29" x 20 cab, Installed an Emmy Guvnor I had, and an Elite80 somebody pulled from a new Egnator, cause they though it wasnt a real Celly (LOL). The Elite80 took forever to break-in, but once it did it sounds great (even being a few db less). Not long afterward I found an empty 1936 for cheap, all torn-up. Fixed the tolex with auto-trim black adhesive, added casters, loaded an Emmy Wizard and Swapthang. At 4" shorter than a half stack, and about 102 db it's a managible monster. I kept both. Use one or the other depending on the venue and set list.
Nice rig, and the aesthetics are fine.Yes, the 1936 baffle is set back at the top - the 1922 baffle is vertical.
View attachment 146750
Thanks.Nice rig, and the aesthetics are fine.
Q: How do you stomp your effects pedals with the board up there? You must be a dancer, or a Ninja, too?
Hi and welcome;Good Afternoon, Everyone!
First post but been here looking and dreaming of that one day when I finally get a tube amp I can join and its finally here! I know the DSL 100H is on the budget side of Marshall's line, but really looking forward to playing it and need a Cab for it and it's my first real tube amp.
Ideally, I would like to get a 212 due to space available and maybe get another one later down the road if I need it. Play mostly 70's, 80's. & 90's rock. I see that Origin 212's are on sale now and I know the 70 Eighty's are not the best, but can they get me by for now and then maybe upgrade later?
I found a 5150 412 locally and a Marshall MG412A as well. I also found some used higher end Marshall Cabs but they start around the $500 range and up. Looking for any and all suggestions. Thanks in advanced!!
ByrdmanFL
I figured as much. Same here mostly, learning some stuff sounds better all by itself through the new rig. The phase shifter, wah, and space delay are just for messing around, so they're in the "stomp" location out front. They do have their places if I'm in "go ahead, emulate someone's riffs, or try to emulate them best you can" mode. I'm running a 1970-ish LP Deluxe pancake body with upgraded pups (full size Gibson HB neck, and DiMarzio SD bridge), and a 1988-ish American Standard Strat (still stock) through the new Marshall boxes. So far, so good, I can't believe the difference from my Fender combo amps.Thanks.
I can stomp them with my....
...finger.
I adjust my effects more often than I turn them on and off - like having all those choices built into the amp.
I'm not running through a set list - just dial in a tone I like, with the guitar I happen to choose, and jam for a while.
Loop cables are long enough to put the board on the floor if I want, but I usually just leave them on top of the amp.
Here you go and it's not even the good B version.
Marshall 1960AV 4x12 Excellent Condition - musical instruments - by owner - sale - craigslist
Excellent shape, loud and cuts. This cab has never left my house since I bought it...just a couple of very minor scuffs you can barely see from moving it from room to room. These speakers are pre...plattsburgh.craigslist.org
Not far from New England so, it could be yours @tallcoolone !
You will always be disappointed you did not get a 4x12.
Those smaller Marshall cabs have NO THUMP
Beat me to it.Until you have to carry it alone often. Tradeoffs are always abound.
Until you drop one.You will always be disappointed you did not get a 4x12.
Those smaller Marshall cabs have NO THUMP
Would have been my first choice, a long time ago, in a galaxy, far, far, away.....As a long time DSL user, I settled on a V30 loaded Cab.