Marshall guvnor MK1

  • Thread starter Rob Harpum
  • Start date
  • This site may earn a commission from merchant affiliate links like Ebay, Amazon, and others.

LKrevival

New Member
Joined
Nov 22, 2011
Messages
397
Reaction score
249
I have one, never even tried it, but maybe I will now. It was given to me by a friend in 1990 when I lent him a Peavey 2x12 and it was stolen so he gave me the pedal as compensation.
 

Gareth Jenkins

New Member
Joined
Oct 11, 2011
Messages
26
Reaction score
3
Location
Warwick, UK
Well, now I'm in the realms of guesswork, having only ever seen the insides of one Guv'nor.

I don't believe that putting a socket on a pcb is going to make a huge difference. That sort of thing is going to be extremely subtle. If I had to put my money on the largest sources of difference it would be, in order:
  1. Quality of TL072,
  2. Quality of capacitors,
  3. Quality of other components,
  4. PCB layout/sockets/wiring.

I've put the IC up front because these things have hundreds of "components" inside, and the difference in sound between something costing pennies is a world apart from something costing ten or a hundred times as much. Of course, which sound you think is better is going to be subjective, but I'd be surprised if the cheapest option was favourite.

I think that the later Guv'nors came in a smaller package? I'm guessing that this involved a redesign of the PCB, although this is unlikely to be a big effect.

As for differences in response of controls, I imagine that component tolerances are going to make even two nominally identical boxes slightly different? I checked on General Guitar Gadgets and it claims that the schematic is for an original Guv'nor. So maybe the later ones were more significantly different?

Interested to know what other people think.

Cheers, Gareth.
 

enfetish

New Member
Joined
Nov 24, 2011
Messages
12
Reaction score
0
Thanks Gareth.

To be clear, I was comparing a Mk1 UK Guvnor with a Mk1 Korean Guvnor, not a Mk2.

On looking at the guts of the UK and Korean ones, even to my eyes, the components look cheaper in the latter and, as you say, there is every chance it is a cheap op amp. What I can say with absolute certainty is that the two sound noticeably different with the UK one so much more tranparent and realistic (i.e. the UK sounds like a Marshall stack and the Korean a more generic distortion pedal).

Cheers!
 

MKB

Well-Known Member
Joined
Jul 15, 2008
Messages
1,268
Reaction score
324
IIRC, the Guvnor was basically the preamp of an old Marshall Lead 12 in a box. Those gained some fame as standalone preamps/boosts during the eighties.

I've played the originals on occasion, and owned a Mk2 for several years, but eventually sold the Mk2 as other pedals did the same job better (OCD for one). The tone controls on the Mk2 were very nice. Maybe if you took a Mk2 and disabled the extra circuitry (low end boost), made sure to have the same op amps and LED's as the original, then you'd get similar results.

It shouldn't be surprising that the same control settings on the Mk1 and 2 would sound different, Marshall probably used different pot values and tapers in each.

BTW, the Mk2 was built like a brick. Maybe the components aren't the same quality as the Mk1, but the build quality of the Mk2 is as good as anything else out there. Nice heavy duty case as well.
 

treetrunk

Active Member
Joined
Jan 9, 2011
Messages
352
Reaction score
70
I have one of these.....got one with the original box and all.....
Have to admit - too many pedals and too little time.....!
But as they say, every pedal has its day ;)
 

Gareth Jenkins

New Member
Joined
Oct 11, 2011
Messages
26
Reaction score
3
Location
Warwick, UK
To be clear, I was comparing a Mk1 UK Guvnor with a Mk1 Korean Guvnor, not a Mk2.
To be honest, I wouldn't know which version I had back then. It was very second hand even back in the mid '90s when I got hold of it. Could be that I've documented the Korean version!

I suspect that its unlikely that the circuit was changed much during the manufacturing move, and as you say that probably puts all differences down to component quality.

It shouldn't be surprising that the same control settings on the Mk1 and 2 would sound different, Marshall probably used different pot values and tapers in each.
That's also possible between the UK/Korea build. I imagine that parts would be sourced differently and things like tapers are likely to vary considerably?

Cheers, Gareth.
 

SpiritOfTheAge

New Member
Joined
Oct 18, 2009
Messages
789
Reaction score
309
Location
A stone's throw from heaven.
Does anyone know How to identify that a Guv'nor is a Mk1 , and that it is UK made ?

DSC_1635.jpg


DSC_1636.jpg
 

Johnt

Active Member
Joined
Jul 25, 2011
Messages
499
Reaction score
165
Location
Kent, England
Yep, I have a Marshall Guv'nor Mk1. It's a permanent feature on my pedal board. You can set it for low level overdrive / crunch through to some great high grain smooth saturation, especially if you use it alongside a compressor. Mine works well with an MXR Dyna Comp.

JohnT
 

mcqlfc

Active Member
Joined
Mar 31, 2011
Messages
348
Reaction score
199
Location
UK
I've just repaired mine (faulty chip so I put JCR 4558D in and it sounds more crystal) and I noticed the boards in mine are cream coloured whereas the others that I have seen are blue. Any ideas why?
 

Diezeldale

New Member
Joined
Jul 2, 2009
Messages
28
Reaction score
1
I pulled mine out of the storage and went for a test drive, Im glad I grabbed these for $75 bucks back in the day, have you seen the EBAY prices these days?
IMG_20130607_222248_002_zps75244dc3.jpg

IMG_20130607_222338_790_zps4e744098.jpg
 
Top