• We are looking to make improvements to the Classifieds! Help us determine what improvements we can make by filling out this classifieds survey. Your feedback is very appreciated and helpful!

    Take survey

Simple Attenuators - Design And Testing

  • Thread starter JohnH
  • Start date
  • This site may earn a commission from merchant affiliate links like Ebay, Amazon, and others.

kenrinc

Member
Joined
May 16, 2023
Messages
26
Reaction score
33
Thanks John,

Resistance measurements are dead on. 8ohm. It seems that R2A and R2b take the brunt of the power as they get really hot and R1 just gets warm. My chassis is not the greatest though. New box coming soon.

K-
 

JohnH

Well-Known Member
Joined
May 31, 2008
Messages
6,155
Reaction score
5,062
Location
Wilton NSW
There could still be something to check out. With a nominal 50W coming in, R1 gets about 28W and R2A and R2B get 8W to 10W each. Those are max values, not all at the same setting though. Overall resistance measurements will vary a little at each setting.
 

matttornado

Well-Known Member
Joined
Mar 14, 2012
Messages
1,900
Reaction score
1,510
Hello. I'm sorry if this been covered before but are ways I can tame the highs by adding a capacitor(s) somewhere? If yes, where would it go and what values / voltage ratings would be a good start?
 

JohnH

Well-Known Member
Joined
May 31, 2008
Messages
6,155
Reaction score
5,062
Location
Wilton NSW
hi @matttornado

Can you remind me again which version and Ohms you use?

For M2, the balance of tone is set by R2A and R2B. The base design targets a neutral tonal change, with the same balance of treble as the full volume sound. If you want less high treble, you could bypass R2B with a cap and resistor in series. I probably wouldn't recomend just a cap since it can throw off impedances too much. Switching it across R2A instead of R2B will lift treble.

Could have presence lift, presence neutral and presence cut using a cap, resistor and an on-off-on toggle.

What sort of change do you seek?

The other place is at the output, across the speaker, again a cap and resistor in series, all in parallel with the output.

A similar effect is if you plug a 16 Ohm cab into the 8 Ohm output of an 8 Ohm M2, where the treble gets softened. That's why there is a compensated 16 Ohm output.

I can work out values but would need to run numbers once you can describe a bit more about what you are after.
 

matttornado

Well-Known Member
Joined
Mar 14, 2012
Messages
1,900
Reaction score
1,510
Thanks for the reply! It looks like I have the M4 with two inductors. I built the 16ohm 100 watt version.

I guess what I really would like is something similar to dialing back a tone control on a guitar, to take some of the shrill away at higher volumes.
A toggle switch likes you suggested would be cool as I don't really need it at low bedroom levels.
 

Gene Ballzz

Well-Known Member
Joined
Feb 19, 2013
Messages
4,697
Reaction score
6,521
Location
Las Vegas, NV
@matttornado ,
The nomenclature on that drawing can indeed be confusing! While John has actually designed a much more elaborate "M-4" unit, with multiple features, that drawing is of the initial "M" design, followed by a "dash" and then the phrase "4 stage Reactive Attenuator" and not actually referring to the "M-4" per se. FYI & FWIW, the "M" is actually just an enhanced version of the "M-lite" that includes full bypass switching and a circuit that tonally compensates for using a 16 ohm speaker on an 8 ohm attenuator.
Simply Clarifying,
Gene
 

JohnH

Well-Known Member
Joined
May 31, 2008
Messages
6,155
Reaction score
5,062
Location
Wilton NSW
Hi @matttornado

With that M attenuator that you posted above, 16 Ohm version, to add a tone option to reduce treble, Id suggest a 2.7uF cap in series with about 30 Ohms, and switch that to connect it from 'ground' to the right side of R2. It will trim down the treble rise. If its too much, try a larger resistor.

For a 50W amp Id suggest 25W for the resistor and the cap needs to be non-polarised and preferable a film or poly cap.
 

matttornado

Well-Known Member
Joined
Mar 14, 2012
Messages
1,900
Reaction score
1,510
Hi @matttornado

With that M attenuator that you posted above, 16 Ohm version, to add a tone option to reduce treble, Id suggest a 2.7uF cap in series with about 30 Ohms, and switch that to connect it from 'ground' to the right side of R2. It will trim down the treble rise. If its too much, try a larger resistor.

For a 50W amp Id suggest 25W for the resistor and the cap needs to be non-polarised and preferable a film or poly cap.
Thanks for taking the time look into that and replying. So with my 100 watt amp I should use 50 watt / 30 ohm resistor, right?
 

JohnH

Well-Known Member
Joined
May 31, 2008
Messages
6,155
Reaction score
5,062
Location
Wilton NSW
yes that sounds ok. If you have any spares around, you could lash something together to test it with lower power, to see if the tone change is what you want
 

stickyfinger

Well-Known Member
Joined
Nov 11, 2010
Messages
1,170
Reaction score
699
I've read the entire thread and I don't recall what the M stands for in the name?
 

JohnH

Well-Known Member
Joined
May 31, 2008
Messages
6,155
Reaction score
5,062
Location
Wilton NSW
I've read the entire thread and I don't recall what the M stands for in the name?

A good question! I was just following where the design and testing led, starting with the letter A, not knowing where it might lead. Each variation got the next letter. At M, it seemed like it had arrived somewhere, and I liked the way 'M' sounds. It's M for Marshall, or MI5, or James Bond's boss. So I stopped with the alphabet there, and since then its been fine tuning and added features based on the same principles.
 

stickyfinger

Well-Known Member
Joined
Nov 11, 2010
Messages
1,170
Reaction score
699
Any reason not to parallel R1 with two 60ohm 50watts instead of going series for 16ohm?
 

fitz

Well-Known Yinzer
Gold Supporting Member
Joined
Apr 7, 2020
Messages
10,980
Reaction score
32,161
Location
SW PA USA
Late to the party, but I've decided to join the club.
Got the John H 16 ohm M2 Ballzz kit & a 17x8x3 Hammond amp chassis w/ lid to put it in.
(Thanks again for your guidance @Gene Ballzz !)
Going to mount everything to a piece of 1/4" 6061 that I'll cut to fit in the chassis on some stand offs.
jh01.jpg
Still need to get some mounting hardware and misc. stuff like a fan & such.
Fairly good chance I'll encase the whole thing in a low-profile Marshall-ish head shell style box.
 

chocol8

Well-Known Member
Joined
Nov 7, 2022
Messages
441
Reaction score
880
Finally got my missing parts yesterday, so I should be able to build one or both this weekend. Looking forward to posting in the completed thread!
 

fitz

Well-Known Yinzer
Gold Supporting Member
Joined
Apr 7, 2020
Messages
10,980
Reaction score
32,161
Location
SW PA USA
Got the mounting plate cut and laid out - plenty of room...
jh02.jpg
Quick question on the wiring of Out 4:
Does R9 go tip to ring on the speaker jack for Out 4?

Capture1.JPG
 

JohnH

Well-Known Member
Joined
May 31, 2008
Messages
6,155
Reaction score
5,062
Location
Wilton NSW
hi @fitz

Yes that's right. So until anything is plugged into Out 4, R9 has no effect and when a standard mono jack is inserted, the ring terminal gets taken to ground by the barrel of the jack. It just fixes a slight extra treble and bass when using a lower ohms speaker.

The layout looks nice and spacious and that AL slab should spread the heat very well.

For the coil, particularly since its on relatively thick Aluminium, best to raise it up on some non-metallic spacer (wood is fine). Usually about 5mm is enough but with your base I'd suggest more if possible, maybe 10mm. Otherwise the coil creates a small induction cooker in the aluminium! This doesn't really make much heat but it throws the coil value off and adds unwanted damping. Also, avoid ferrous bolts through the coil.

Good luck, I reckon it should wire together in a nice open and relaxingly clear build!
 

fitz

Well-Known Yinzer
Gold Supporting Member
Joined
Apr 7, 2020
Messages
10,980
Reaction score
32,161
Location
SW PA USA
hi @fitz

Yes that's right. So until anything is plugged into Out 4, R9 has no effect and when a standard mono jack is inserted, the ring terminal gets taken to ground by the barrel of the jack. It just fixes a slight extra treble and bass when using a lower ohms speaker.

The layout looks nice and spacious and that AL slab should spread the heat very well.

For the coil, particularly since its on relatively thick Aluminium, best to raise it up on some non-metallic spacer (wood is fine). Usually about 5mm is enough but with your base I'd suggest more if possible, maybe 10mm. Otherwise the coil creates a small induction cooker in the aluminium! This doesn't really make much heat but it throws the coil value off and adds unwanted damping. Also, avoid ferrous bolts through the coil.

Good luck, I reckon it should wire together in a nice open and relaxingly clear build!
Thanks @JohnH ,
The Ballzz kit came with just about everything I'll need, including a non-ferrous nut & bolt for the coil.
I put the coil on a hard plastic spacer that's 3/8" thick, but I could easily add another - the bolt is plenty long enough.
There are also some smaller diameter, but same thickness, spacers between the corners of the plate and chassis box.
Extra coil spacer shown beside the ready to wire enclosure.
jh03.jpg
 

Latest posts



Top