- Joined
- Nov 19, 2010
- Messages
- 13,862
- Reaction score
- 7,292
oh geeze...here we go.
this is my thought process:
if there are no prizes, there is less motivation to cheat or be dishonest. however, IF someone wanted to volunteer to offer a prize or something thats fine, but i think that should also be kept under wraps until its all said and done. you offer free stuff and its like blood in the water.
its supposed to be the honor system. if you cant handle that, dont participate.
im telling you all right now, im not dealing with an inbox full of shit. and im not interested in endless finite details and rules.
the rule is simple, and it is based on the honor system. if the judges remain anonymous, that is less drama they have to deal with for 30 days while this thing is in progress.
aus, im thinking that the judges could tally their votes BEFORE the popular vote and send those results to a neutral party to be revealed AFTER the popular vote has taken place, then no one can complain about undue influence of one or the other.
i also agree that songs should NOT be submitted until like a 72 or 48 hour window b4 the end of the contest.
the more of a nightmare you make this for the judges, the less likely they will want to participate. and like ive said, i certainly dont want to deal with a bunch of nonsense either.
does that make sense to everyone?
this is my thought process:
if there are no prizes, there is less motivation to cheat or be dishonest. however, IF someone wanted to volunteer to offer a prize or something thats fine, but i think that should also be kept under wraps until its all said and done. you offer free stuff and its like blood in the water.
its supposed to be the honor system. if you cant handle that, dont participate.
im telling you all right now, im not dealing with an inbox full of shit. and im not interested in endless finite details and rules.
the rule is simple, and it is based on the honor system. if the judges remain anonymous, that is less drama they have to deal with for 30 days while this thing is in progress.
aus, im thinking that the judges could tally their votes BEFORE the popular vote and send those results to a neutral party to be revealed AFTER the popular vote has taken place, then no one can complain about undue influence of one or the other.
i also agree that songs should NOT be submitted until like a 72 or 48 hour window b4 the end of the contest.
the more of a nightmare you make this for the judges, the less likely they will want to participate. and like ive said, i certainly dont want to deal with a bunch of nonsense either.
does that make sense to everyone?