Marcomel79
Well-Known Member
I thought about it as well. If you have a spare 220K resistor i would take that out and replace itCould the 220k resistor (in blue) be faulty, although it measures correctly with the low voltage from the DMM?
I thought about it as well. If you have a spare 220K resistor i would take that out and replace itCould the 220k resistor (in blue) be faulty, although it measures correctly with the low voltage from the DMM?
This is a valid question: Is the bias circuit grounded at all?Do the positive ends of the bias caps measure ~zero resistance to ground/chassis?
Ill open up my jmp later today and do a comparison. Maybe @Pete Farrington can give us his opinion?
Could be interesting to see what resistance you measure between 4 and 5, when you turn the bias pot both full clockwise and full counterclockwise.
No voltage, drained caps!
As already mentioned, -160 VDC bias voltage is not normal.
View attachment 159041
Exactly, my guess is a connection between point 5 and the circuit common chassis is missing.Do the positive ends of the bias caps measure ~zero resistance to ground/chassis?
Wait I just realised does it need to go to ground of the chassis first and then the filter cap?
Looks like he didn't connect it to a grounding lug, He just ran the black wire from bias pot directly to filter cap.Can you check where this black wires goes and to which grounding lug it goes to? (see red arrows below).
Those grounding lugs should have a shakeproof washer (the sharp teeth cut into the surface past any surface treatment):
the output jacks are going to the presence pot, and from the presence pot he ran a wire to the PI filter cap. All without being connected to ground it seems....Can you check where this black wires goes and to which grounding lug it goes to? (see red arrows below).
Those grounding lugs should have a shakeproof washer (the sharp teeth cut into the surface past any surface treatment):
View attachment 159073