_ripper_
Well-Known Member
- Joined
- Oct 1, 2013
- Messages
- 447
- Reaction score
- 413
Hey y'all!
So, I recently bought an inexpensive attenuator, the Harley Benton PA-100 from Thomann. It's supposed to be a clone of the Jet City Jettenuator, which in also inexpensive.
I made a quick demo clip of it, playing a riff with my DSL100H through my 1936V cab. The configurations were as follows:
1) DSL with master @3 (loud - not home friendly),
2) DSL with master @0.75 (home volume),
3) DSL w/attenuation (master @3), and
4) again the DSL w master @3
I did it this way so that in all the meaningful comparisons (master up vs. master down, master down vs. attenuation and attenuation vs master up) the clips would be back to back. Also, the riff repeats twice with every configuration for a total of 8 repetitions.
For me, the most important factor in deciding to keep the attenuator or not is if sounds better than the DSL at home volume. The reason is that I dont really have any neighbors so I can turn up the amp to record, but for demoing song ideas or just playing I prefer a lower volume, as do my wfe and kids, haha.
NOTE: Settings are the same in all configurations EXCEPT in the clip with the attenuator, where I've turned up the treble on the amp a tad (5.5 to 6.5) to compensate for the fact that you do lose some highs with it.
EDIT: Here's another clip with the attenuator where I'm using the Green Crunch channel with the master on 10 for obtaining power amp distortion at manageable levels. It's also further down in the thread but I'm adding it here as well so the clips are in one place.
So, what do you guys think? Nay or yay?
Cheers,
ripper
So, I recently bought an inexpensive attenuator, the Harley Benton PA-100 from Thomann. It's supposed to be a clone of the Jet City Jettenuator, which in also inexpensive.
I made a quick demo clip of it, playing a riff with my DSL100H through my 1936V cab. The configurations were as follows:
1) DSL with master @3 (loud - not home friendly),
2) DSL with master @0.75 (home volume),
3) DSL w/attenuation (master @3), and
4) again the DSL w master @3
I did it this way so that in all the meaningful comparisons (master up vs. master down, master down vs. attenuation and attenuation vs master up) the clips would be back to back. Also, the riff repeats twice with every configuration for a total of 8 repetitions.
For me, the most important factor in deciding to keep the attenuator or not is if sounds better than the DSL at home volume. The reason is that I dont really have any neighbors so I can turn up the amp to record, but for demoing song ideas or just playing I prefer a lower volume, as do my wfe and kids, haha.
NOTE: Settings are the same in all configurations EXCEPT in the clip with the attenuator, where I've turned up the treble on the amp a tad (5.5 to 6.5) to compensate for the fact that you do lose some highs with it.
EDIT: Here's another clip with the attenuator where I'm using the Green Crunch channel with the master on 10 for obtaining power amp distortion at manageable levels. It's also further down in the thread but I'm adding it here as well so the clips are in one place.
So, what do you guys think? Nay or yay?
Cheers,
ripper
Last edited: