Hey at least i tried experimented and then corrected what i claimed. However there is the nice thing while everyone was telling gain and disto came mainly from the studio work this experiment proved me that the pedals were the main cause behind gain and distortion. No wonder why when angus young was once interviewed he said he saw eddies pedalboard he said something like it looked like someone going to the moon. he knew that eddies tone was in part inside his gear.Did you just... wait, did he say what I think he did...?
Well, I think you're finally starting to understand what some have been saying all along; many, many factors come in to play here. Fudge one thing somewhere in the signal chain and even if it's intentional, it can be hard to recreate yourself. Let alone someone else who doesn't know the exact chain involved or ever saw it.
Woah, no joke? An 1176... in a studio at that time? Or even today... what a surprise...
You know there are quite a few revisions of "the 1176" and it was not uncommon for studio engineers to make their own adjustments to the circuits, right? These were rack units, not pedals.
That signal chain is backwards, but OK. Are you still trying to replicate the record tone in the room, or are you planning on recording and such?
There are similarities, but I would instantly say something's off, honestly. Particularly at the end. Let's hear how the studio recordings go.
Whilst not the absolute creme de la creme, it's not going to be the element at fault here likely. Again, those studio recordings will be interesting to compare.
Last edited: