Mike_LA
Well-Known Member
No f@#king way.It's a Marshall. You want clean? Buy a F*nd*r.
The Clean in my Marshall 6101 will stand toe to toe with ANY F*nd*r and I own a 1968 Princeton Reverb...
No f@#king way.It's a Marshall. You want clean? Buy a F*nd*r.
What's the downside of using a JHS Little Black Amp Box volume pedal in the loop? One fella on reverb listed his as "Pedal board passive attenuator".I have an '84 ~ 4210.
Loop works just fine at any volume.
I also recently put a JHS Little Black Amp Box volume pedal in the loop, and it works great at taming down the preamp signal so there's more control of the MV.
Describing it as an attenuator is not very accurate - it's a line level volume knob, plain and simple.What's the downside of using a JHS Little Black Amp Box volume pedal in the loop? One fella on reverb listed his as "Pedal board passive attenuator".
Curious...
I have the '89.One thing to keep in mind is there are 2 revisions of the 2205/2210, first one is '83-'86 and works well as the OP described since there is actually channel bleed between the 2 channels so it's best to set the normal channel to crunch and use the boost channel to take it over the top.
From '87-'90 the second revision fixed the channel bleed and added more gain to the boost channel. These amps can be used a regular channel switcher without any issue. BTW, most of the "famous" users of this amp (Schenker, Norum, Morello etc) use the later version.
It's not an attenuator, just an additional volume control. It's great for amps that have a "jumpy" master volume where 1 is super quiet and 2 is stage volume already. Then it gives you more range of control over the amp's volume. But it's not really attenuating anything since it's placed in the fx loop before the power amp.What's the downside of using a JHS Little Black Amp Box volume pedal in the loop? One fella on reverb listed his as "Pedal board passive attenuator".
Curious...