MarshallDog
Well-Known Member
If true they could trie other woods or do what Gibson did using something called burnt maple??? I saw and played a few and I couldnt really tell a difference.
but in the meantime, check out the rosewood neck Fenders we have in stock.
Maybe a panic buy?
I wonder how much one of these will get ya.
Article in this months Guitar and Bass Magazine (UK) with interviews from different manufacturers (Taylor, Gibson and Fender) talking about CITES and other interpretation of US and European legislation on protected timber.
Fender has a choice. Gibson ain't gawt a pot to piss in.
Gibson has the Epiphone plant... ...Fender has a choice. Gibson ain't gawt a pot to piss in.
I like rosewood but as long as a substitute looks and performs the same I'm ok with it. Burnt maple sureIf true they could trie other woods or do what Gibson did using something called burnt maple??? I saw and played a few and I couldnt really tell a difference.
That explains why Gibson Custom was making two piece East Indian Rosewood fingerboards for the 2012 R9's .Baked Maple I believe was the term - got one. Makes for a slightly brighter more attacking tone than rosewood. Feels very dry under the finger.
Looks cheap in comparison I feel to rosewood.
See pic of LP Studio 2012.
Gibson used it as a stop-gap when the Feds confiscated their wood shed contents !
View attachment 40788
How does it do that?Makes for a slightly brighter more attacking tone than rosewood.
How does it do that?
But how do the magnetic pickups know what kind of sound the wood is dissipating into the atmosphere? Can't they only respond to ferrous metallic strings?In the same way Strats with maple boards have slightly more cut or bite to their tone...well known fact among luthiers....but that's another story.