gazzamarad
Member
Hi all. Joey mods I have done
Pot board
1m resistor wiper to ground vr3
c12 to 150pf
c10 replace .0022
R20 remove and jumper
tube board
R30 piggyback to value 190
MM o/t and 3h choke.
To date i have found advantages and disadvantages.
To explain and maybe point the finger I will mention a guy on a Tsl forum who suggested that the MM o/t is better and more linear at loud volumes but the stock 3070 dagnall had some tonal qualities at lower volumes that are warmer and truer to the marshall sound.( The MM never runs hot whereas the stock dag does.) I tend to agree here as I still find my mods in the lead channel are a definite improvement but overall I feel the amp has lost some of its spunky marshall definition. I have read this forum quite thoroughly and while there are one or two mods I could still do I am thinking that I may have upgraded with the wrong o/t for the sound that " I am chasing"....which is a vintage marshall sound. (should I have gone for the c1998 dagnall?)I recently A/B my head with a 50watt
1973 marshall head...( yes lucky me tho not mine) linked both inputs on the 73... great sound tho dsl obviously more versatile. End result was that my dsl sounded less alive, deader than the old 73. The 73 had more bite and sting in the mid range.
My settings on the dsl are
eq...pres 6 treb 5 mid 5 bass 8....deep switch on
ultra gain 2; vol 4 gain 2 (cant get above this due to feedback. I do use a tubescreamer drive 9 oclock, tone 5, level 3oclock)
clean vol 4 gain 7 with tube screamer as I prefer this to crunch mode, which I dont use, so far)...As well as reading the pages above I am really starting to wonder if the o/t is the key here. Dont get me wrong the MM is a mo fo of a tranny but maybe more for "big gigs" rather than small pub venues. Can some of you wonderful lads help me out a bit here....I may just need to do c9 and c12 mods to finish up, I dont know. My amp tech is a great and patient human but I'm sure I am starting to wear him thin just like my wallett! LOL...My head is a 2006 100watt with the improved pcb board with the 5k6 values. It still has the c46 on it. Should that be removed?
Thanks to everyone on this remarkable forum for all of your input...cheers ...Gaz
Pot board
1m resistor wiper to ground vr3
c12 to 150pf
c10 replace .0022
R20 remove and jumper
tube board
R30 piggyback to value 190
MM o/t and 3h choke.
To date i have found advantages and disadvantages.
To explain and maybe point the finger I will mention a guy on a Tsl forum who suggested that the MM o/t is better and more linear at loud volumes but the stock 3070 dagnall had some tonal qualities at lower volumes that are warmer and truer to the marshall sound.( The MM never runs hot whereas the stock dag does.) I tend to agree here as I still find my mods in the lead channel are a definite improvement but overall I feel the amp has lost some of its spunky marshall definition. I have read this forum quite thoroughly and while there are one or two mods I could still do I am thinking that I may have upgraded with the wrong o/t for the sound that " I am chasing"....which is a vintage marshall sound. (should I have gone for the c1998 dagnall?)I recently A/B my head with a 50watt
1973 marshall head...( yes lucky me tho not mine) linked both inputs on the 73... great sound tho dsl obviously more versatile. End result was that my dsl sounded less alive, deader than the old 73. The 73 had more bite and sting in the mid range.
My settings on the dsl are
eq...pres 6 treb 5 mid 5 bass 8....deep switch on
ultra gain 2; vol 4 gain 2 (cant get above this due to feedback. I do use a tubescreamer drive 9 oclock, tone 5, level 3oclock)
clean vol 4 gain 7 with tube screamer as I prefer this to crunch mode, which I dont use, so far)...As well as reading the pages above I am really starting to wonder if the o/t is the key here. Dont get me wrong the MM is a mo fo of a tranny but maybe more for "big gigs" rather than small pub venues. Can some of you wonderful lads help me out a bit here....I may just need to do c9 and c12 mods to finish up, I dont know. My amp tech is a great and patient human but I'm sure I am starting to wear him thin just like my wallett! LOL...My head is a 2006 100watt with the improved pcb board with the 5k6 values. It still has the c46 on it. Should that be removed?
Thanks to everyone on this remarkable forum for all of your input...cheers ...Gaz