marshallmellowed
Well-Known Member
- Joined
- Jun 26, 2009
- Messages
- 6,510
- Reaction score
- 11,751
Well, I've owned a few Marshalls, including a JVM 410H and a JVM 410HJS, and still own a few. For versatility (in a Marshall), it's hard to beat a JVM. However, if you read the posts on the JVM forum, you'll see a ton of posts from people either modding the amp, or wanting to mod the amp. I had modded both of mine, quite a bit, before finally selling them. In it's stock form, it's been referred to as "stiff", "too compressed", "noisy", "lacking balls".... If you're expecting true JCM 800 tone and feel from a JVM, be prepared to mod it. If you need all the versatility of multiple channels, 3 modes per channel, on-board reverb, and a programmable footswitch, then the JVM is your amp. If you're primary interest is the best tone you can get for home use, even if it's from a single channel amp, I'd look very hard at the SC20 and SV20 amps. Both amps, although they won't deliver the punch of their bigger brothers (2203 & 1959), have excellent tone and feel, which, in the end, is what inspires us to play. My 2 cents.Thankx alotttt people!! Now I am having the choice. C20 vs SV20 vs JVM.
I don't need a complete 100% recreation of a tone just one that comes close to those plexi and hot rodded tones at same time. More of a "kinda of" tone.
Thank you very much so far!!
I love the SV20 but I am afraid it cannot hit the tone of a boosted SC20 and vice versa. JVM maybe would be an option but can it get a convincing JCM and Plexi tone? Not 100% I know but get into the area...
Last edited: