ClassicTone
Member
- Joined
- Sep 2, 2010
- Messages
- 147
- Reaction score
- 14
Thanks RickyLee!
Help please with OT and choke choices. I'm soon to be the owner of 2008, JCM 2000 DSL 100.
I'm not in any rush to replace anything inside the amp. But over a few months might opt for a new OT and choke.
Question: What sets apart upgrade replacement OT's from one another?
Example, there are several companies making OT's for Marshall amps:
Mercury Magnetics
ClassicTone
Heyboer
Dagnall
Hammond
Take the Mercury Fatstack for example, and compare it with the Classictone, or a Heyboer to a Dagnall.
Where do the differences lie between them - in tone, I'm not really concerned with hair splitting here.
Does the extra iron mass in the Mercury Fatstack sound different to any of the other OT's?
Does the Heyboer impart a different tonality than a Hammond?
Please explain if you can. Thanks.
I think you sold me. It's hard for a non technical person like me to sift through all the "stuff". I have read that OT's and chokes can impact tone significantly, at least enough to be heard. I'm sure they're top notch. I know one guy who says he's replaced 3 OT's in his Marshall's to Mercury Mag's. Probably because of marketing - I don't know.
I mean, is a Heyboer any more robust than yours, or a Dagnall? I think it's the stuff that only engineers can answer for real.
I think you guys "Classic Tone" and "Mercury" should do a video/tone shoot out - side by side, with both reps from each company there, and have a 3rd objective party choose identical production Marshall amps for you, no hand wired stuff.
Add to this that there's a 3rd, identical JCM 2000 DSL 100 present, with the stock OT and choke. Let the games begin - FOR REAL.
You're both required to mount the OT's and chokes in the same room with the video still rolling (time lapsed of course) then a sound test - you both use the same guitar player, same guitar and same speaker cabinet. I think that would dispel some of the "mojo" that people assign to these things - make it practical and objective, real - let the marketing happen after the proof.
Case in point, The "Overlooked Upgrade”: Guitar Amplifier Output Transformers article by David Szabados. It's strange to me that he only tested the reissue SLP, and older amps. What about testing them in newer production amps, like the DSL's? And, he only used Mercury Transformers, not any other brand.
I trust that your classic tone OT's and chokes are well made and worth every penny. But would I absolutely notice a tonal difference with an OT and choke upgrade vs what's stock in the DSL now? Thanks.
I already posted this info in the Workbench section. I figured it would be good to post this here as well.
This is in regards to swapping in the new ClassicTone output transformer 40-18055 into my DSL100.
I am getting ready to swap in the new ClassicTone DSL100/TSL100 output transformer 40-18055 into my DSL100. I am looking for some verification on the wiring scheme and more importantly the OT polarity/orientation. Has anyone else here installed this ClassicTone OT?
Someone please correct me if I am wrong.
I am figuring the DSL100 wiring orientation for the new 40-18055 primary to DSL100 TUBE BOARD will be:
Primary of 40-18055 RED to V5 V6 plates (WHITE on DSL100 W3)
Primary of 40-18055 WHITE to V7 V8 plates (VIOLET on DSL100 W4)
Primary of 40-18055 center tap is BROWN and that will go to BLUE W5 on DSL100
40-18055 secondary DSL100 REAR BOARD will be:
Secondary of 40-18055 BLUE 16 ohm to REAR BOARD RED W5
Secondary of 40-18055 YELLOW 8 ohm to REAR BOARD ORANGE W1
Secondary of 40-18055 GREEN 4 ohm to REAR BOARD GREEN W3
Secondary of 40-18055 ORANGE Common to REAR BOARD BLACK W6
The 40-18055 secondary has one more wire/lead that the stock DSL Dagnall. The 4 ohm VIOLET/GREEN, so I am figuring the 40-18055 extra VIOLET lead is for the negative feedback loop and will connect to the DSL REAR BOARD W4?
Or actually I would not even connect the OT VIOLET as the DSL already has a termination joining the NFB loop to the 4 ohm tap?
http://www.classictone.net/40-18055.pdf
Finally got around to getting the ClassicTone 40-18055 output transformer swapped into my DSL100 in place of the stock Dagnall. And I just got done cranking it pretty hard. I have to say I am quite impressed so far, and I am figuring there's a bit of a break-in period to expect as well?
The highs seem to be extended slightly, but not in a bad way as in ice picky type highs. Overall the tone seems to be more colorful for lack of a better word. Full chord clarity is very good even at high gain settings.
Should I expect a slight tonal change after X amount of usage hours?
And I am playing it cranked out of the gate. Is this good?
And lastly, is the transformer break-in period a myth?
I have a Brand new JCM 800 Full stack with 1960 lead 300watt cabs and I use a sd1 in front of it to push the tubes. I play old school type metal (priest,maiden, sabbath) what can this product do for me? I would like more gain so I can plug right in without an OD pedal...I was told a tube change is all I need as marshall uses shitty soviet tubes instead of american made groove tubes. Is this true? and if so, what do you suggest? will this make my amp louder or what? Thank you. GL HF!
Hey there!
I'm looking into building a Ceriatone, the #35 AFD 50w in fact. I was wondering which transformers would you recommend for my build?
Thanks in advance!