no! people are visual first and that's misleading for our lives.
so 1 has always meant, "look there's a tree/animal, that's number 1".
this concept is wrong.
the process of restoring space to it's comfortable level of minus 440 is the 'thing' I'm trying to apply a 'number 1 concept' to.
the emptyness of space is important and not the stars in it.
we've all been fooled by daylight.
daylight revieled counting to us.
so therefore it's wrong. "how many stars can you see? lets count them."
"no that's wrong grandpa! the void needs to be counted cause it's here first. it's older".
so 1 has always meant, "look there's a tree/animal, that's number 1".
this concept is wrong.
the process of restoring space to it's comfortable level of minus 440 is the 'thing' I'm trying to apply a 'number 1 concept' to.
the emptyness of space is important and not the stars in it.
we've all been fooled by daylight.
daylight revieled counting to us.
so therefore it's wrong. "how many stars can you see? lets count them."
"no that's wrong grandpa! the void needs to be counted cause it's here first. it's older".