We are looking to make improvements to the Classifieds! Help us determine what improvements we can make by filling out this classifieds survey. Your feedback is very appreciated and helpful!
i THINK YOUR ALL MISSING THE POINT, THE TIME FRAME IS A red herring...HE PAID FOR SERVICES AND PARTS HE DIDN'T RECIEVE...I don't care if it took a thousand years...well, maybe not quite that long...
that amp is not a 1992 super bass, its the marshall Bass Amp JCM, totally different beast. The 1992 is like the 1959, your amp, the JCM Bass amp, is NOT, HENCE THE CLEAN TONE UP TO THE TOP...its made for bass. think Trace Elliot tone, not Hendrix at Monterey
Im with PMAN, how many of those, in any condtion let alone that FINE condition, are remaining??? I remember when original '59 les pauls were $10k...we all thought that was NUTS...
Re: Wondering if I got burnt..........
i live in ft. lauderdale area, what is the techs name!!! wow, terrible...BUT WHY AM I NOT SURPRISED!!! Read some of my posts in other forums, NO SUCH THING AS A GOOD TECH IN SOUTH FLORIDA!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
For the record I;m 45, and played regularly for 35 of those years...Just hear and feel all the classics in my amps, and get my tone every time...found ALL the newer amps harsh and too staticy/fizzy. Just not the same. But YES, any amp will get a great player great tone...no doubt in that!
How can you say a DSL is more dependable than a vintage handwired Marshall? DO you really think that DSL will be playing as is in 40 years?? I have 10 hand wired Marshall heads, they are always dead on quiet and ballsy as hell...if you want that modern sound, simply throw a pedal in...
No doubt, I love them. I have a 1968 100 watt pa, the 1963 50 watt pa, and a little 71 20 watt pa. They just sound awesome, and they have the closest to Mil Spec wiring Marshall ever did. Did you know Jimmy Page used the PA models back in the day? A certain guitarist from WHO also favored...
Funny end to this story...I ended up with the 71 1963. First, only the front panel and rear panel were retolexed, and it was with original marshall afaik, looks identical, just a slight bit newer. Great job. Second, yes, those are Bugle boys with one RCA 7025. The trannies are the key in...
In '77 there were SEVERAL PCB amps made with mustard caps. They are the bomb. They must have found a stash or got a great deal that year...truly a beautiful 1987 head...
My '69 Super Bass has the cornell Dubelier polyproplene caps in the output coupling section, .1 at 600 volt. Since they are rated higher voltage, 600v vs. the 400 volt mustard style, they tend to have more punch IN THE OUTPUT STAGE. In the preamp stage, .022s, and the tone stack, they don't...
All three of my 1oo watt marshalls, two from the 60s and one from 71, have Dagnalls the OTs have the self lead with the little red tips, and one PT is a laydown and the other two are stand up PTs. I love Dagnalls...Nothing really cheap about them, unless you compare them to 60s partridge...
vintage refers to the hand made amps, Point to point hand wired, up to mid '73 would be my line for "Vintage" Marshalls. I have an '81 2203, all pcb, I like it very much, but I woulnd't consider it a vintage Marshall...now my plexis, that's vintage!
DIdn't Jason Becker use a 900 on DLR Skyscraper? If he used it, Im sure it has mass potential. Plus, that tone he got, feels like paradise or something, sounds nice and classic-open sounding in the intro, open chordal tones, very early marshall sounding
All the above, of course, don't forget Alex Lifeson on ATWAS. Great, raw Marshall tone. Love that phasor sound, and his later stuff from Hemispheres is cleaner and tighter, probably the Hiwatts.