The Official Marshall Studio Vintage Thread Sv20h

[marshallmellowed]

Both amps sound very close in this video, my 1959 and SV20H dont sound anything alike.

I agree, then again, they are compressed recordings. I've A/B'd my amps (various sizes) many times, same result every time. When it comes to overall fullness, and that percussive punch that comes from the larger amps, 100w > 50w > 20w... all day long. I do applaud Marshall for their efforts on the Studio amps, long overdue and fill the needs of those looking for smaller amps.

 

[C-4]

I think that's the reason for 10inch speakers in the combos. Less cone, less air movement, less spl. In 5 watt mode with a single openback 10, it'll be like pushing a fender champ.. loud but not unreasonable in a house ..
5 watt into a 4x12 at the same time, would probably be a bit shy at rehearsal with a loud drummer, but doable in a small room
J

Over her, in the States, they call that "legal ease", or how lawyers write sentences.

 

[scozz]

……….Not really interested in whether anyone agrees,…… ………I know what I like.

This is my feeling exactly!

 

[ken Tucky]

@ken Tucky

I liked the 1W anniversary amps a lot, too.
Hopefully Marshall will release another such kind of amps.
Maybe 5 watts (switchable to 0,5) with a 12BH7A in the power amp.
And of course all tube design so they would stand above a Blackstar HT-5.

In regards to best Marshall for home use at lower volume - I personally think the JVM is the best.
I play a JVM215C combo with a single 12" speaker for years and haven't found something better.
It's just the design of the circuit, most of the sound from the preamp and a clean poweramp with a lot of negative feedback.
Santiago Alvarez who designed the amp told me once that he himself wanted an amp that sounds also great at lower volume levels - and I honestly think that he did a great job with the JVM.

Yes, a friend has a JVM and it does indeed sound very good at low volume. But as you said "most of the sound from the preamp" which (to me at least) is a feel and response many master volume equipped amps can replicate (IMO) at low volume. Handy for reduced volume while keeping high gain intact especially. I am more specifically praising the JTM 1 watter for it's ability to produce a plexi like, low gain feel and vibe at minimal volume levels. No amp I've ever used has done so better IME as far as retaining a NMV character in the tone.

 

[tce63]

Yes, a friend has a JVM and it does indeed sound very good at low volume. But as you said "most of the sound from the preamp" which (to me at least) is a feel and response many master volume equipped amps can replicate (IMO) at low volume. Handy for reduced volume while keeping high gain intact especially. I am more specifically praising the JTM 1 watter for it's ability to produce a plexi like, low gain feel and vibe at minimal volume levels. No amp I've ever used has done so better IME as far as retaining a NMV character in the tone.

I also have the JTM1H, Offset version (same amp)
Sounds fantastic at low volume, 1 watt is louder than you think.

 

[ken Tucky]

I also have the JTM1H, Offset version (same amp) Sounds fantastic at low volume, 1 watt is louder than you think.

Yes it is louder than one would think at 1 watt. I use a PB100 to attenuate it directly from the 1 watt setting which IMO sounds better than using the amps available .1 watt setting.

 

[tce63]

Yes it is louder than one would think at 1 watt. I use a PB100 to attenuate it directly from the 1 watt setting which IMO sounds better than using the amps available .1 watt setting.

And I use a Weber Mini Mass 50

 

[marshallmellowed]

This is my feeling exactly!

I'm sure many feel that way, but each of us with different needs. To get the sound & feel I want, I personally need more than 20w (most of the time).

 

[kinleyd]

Vintage Celestion Greenback Prices are Ridiculous - What are the best Alternatives?​

 

[Maggot Brain]

Vintage Celestion Greenback Prices are Ridiculous - What are the best Alternatives?​

Hmm, nothing sounds like those original Greenbscks. They both sounded better/closer on the lead playing. I think the V type would have been a strong contender, as mine continue to break end I'm noticing a more pronounced GB type "honk" etc... He gave the MF a shout out, does he ever post around here? I always wondered why he isn't around this place.

 

[junk notes]

You cannot play a 25 watt speaker like a 65w..

and these speakers are not alternatives on to themselves? not sure about his POV..

 

[Maggot Brain]

You cannot play a 25 watt speaker like a 65w..

and these speakers are not alternatives on to themselves? not sure about his POV..

Yeah I feel you, I think he was just ballparking the tone. I feel like he has already done this type of speaker shoot out before tho.

 

[kinleyd]

Is the Marshall Studio Vintage 2x12 too Small to Sound BIG?​

Johan continues to chew on a few thoughts.

 

[BlueX]

Is the Marshall Studio Vintage 2x12 too Small to Sound BIG?​

Johan continues to chew on a few thoughts.

I like the sound from the 1972 cab. The SV212 sounds good too, and might cut through the mix better (depending on what music).

 

[tallcoolone]

I'm sure many feel that way, but each of us with different needs. To get the sound & feel I want, I personally need more than 20w (most of the time).

How many times can one individual say the same exact thing in one thread? You are gonna find out!

 

[tallcoolone]

Is the Marshall Studio Vintage 2x12 too Small to Sound BIG?​

Johan continues to chew on a few thoughts.

I thought the same about the studio cabs--it sounded ok in this vid, not sure it sounds $1200 good. That’s pretty insane for a 2x12 cab—the Jubilee matching 2x12 is $200 more! I got an EVH 2x12 with the same speakers in it 2 weeks ago for $260 locally.

 

[Maggot Brain]

Is the Marshall Studio Vintage 2x12 too Small to Sound BIG?​

Johan continues to chew on a few thoughts.

I liked this video and think the SV212 held it's own. The SV212 definitely has more mid focus so I think it would cut much better than the 1972.

I actually think those 2 cabs would compliment eachother perfectly as a little weirdo stack!

.... Oh and I'm really digging the Vtypes still!

 

[rolijen]

I talked about my experience with the Boss Waza TAE in a 1987x thread, but let it be noted that the SV20 sounds equally amazing through the TAE. The TAE can take the SV20 from whisper quiet to 100 watts of glorious vintage Marshall tone. The reverb and other effects in the TAE, along with headphone out, effects loop, line out, midi, and foot switch ability are tailor made for the SV20 and (true to the product’s name) greatly “expand”’ the capability of our favorite mini plexi.

After playing 1959s for years and more recently a 1987x, the SV20 never really delivered the clean headroom or low end girth of my higher wattage plexi’s. The TAE levels the playing field.

I run the SV20 in 20watt mode and set the TAE Input Level selector to 10watts (available options are 10w, 50w, 100w). The 10watt setting makes the amp sound huge—easily as good as my 1987x.

It’s pricey, but well worth it. For me, it’s an essential piece of gear that I now use every day. Hopefully this report is of use to you if you’re looking at the TAE.

 

[kinleyd]

This CHEAP method makes your Marshall SV212 the ULTIMATE Recording Cab!​

 

[kinleyd]

How to Tweak a Marshall Studio Vintage Amp!​